Books · Therapy101
On this page
  1. Book details
  2. What it is & historical context
  3. Core clinical themes & arguments
  4. Clinical practice, reception & legacy
  5. Reader level & educational scope
  6. Paired academic and clinical scholarship
  7. Source-mapped claims and evidence notes
  8. Related reading
  9. Sources and inspection notes
Mara Selvini Palazzoli, Luigi Boscolo, Gianfranco Cecchin and Giuliana Prata · 1978 edition · First published 1975Clinical & Theoretical MonographLevel: Advanced

Books / Systemic & family

Paradox and Counterparadox: A New Model in the Therapy of the Family in Schizophrenic Transaction

Mara Selvini Palazzoli, Luigi Boscolo, Gianfranco Cecchin and Giuliana Prata present a family therapy model in Paradox and Counterparadox. This entry describes the 1978 English translation of their Italian work.

Book details

Author of listed edition: Mara Selvini Palazzoli, Luigi Boscolo, Gianfranco Cecchin and Giuliana Prata

Edition: 1st English edition (1978; original Italian 1975, Feltrinelli)

Publisher: Jason Aronson

Edition year: 1978

First published: 1975

Original title: Paradosso e controparadosso: Un nuovo modello nella terapia della famiglia a transazione schizofrenica

Language and origin: Italian (Milan) · English translation by Elisabeth V. Burt

Form and genre: Clinical & Theoretical Monograph

Level: Advanced

Historical era: 1960–1979 · Humanistic, Cognitive & Systemic Turn

Covers: The authors’ systemic model of family therapy; Paradox and counterparadox as concepts in the authors’ approach

APA 7th reference: Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1978). Paradox and counterparadox: A new model in the therapy of the family in schizophrenic transaction (E. V. Burt, Trans.). Jason Aronson. (Original work published 1975)

What it is & historical context

The Italian work appeared in 1975; the English translation by Elisabeth V. Burt was published by Jason Aronson in 1978. The authors present a systemic family therapy model. The historical title uses language that reflects the book’s period and should not be taken as an explanation of schizophrenia.

Core clinical themes & arguments

The book presents paradox and counterparadox in family therapy. Its systemic account is a historical clinical framework; it does not establish that any particular family pattern causes a psychiatric diagnosis.

Clinical practice, reception & legacy

In a subsequent 1980 paper, the authors describe hypothesising, circularity and neutrality as principles for family interviewing. The publication of a clinical model does not demonstrate the effectiveness of a particular technique or session interval.

Reader level & educational scope

This advanced entry is an educational orientation. Library records and the abstract of the 1980 article were consulted; the full book and article were not reviewed. Historical clinical concepts should be read critically and in context.

Paired academic and clinical scholarship

Paired work: Hypothesizing: Circularity: Neutrality: Three Guidelines for the Conductor of the Session (Mara Selvini Palazzoli, Luigi Boscolo, Gianfranco Cecchin, and Giuliana Prata, 1980)

Reference: Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing-circularity-neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19(1), 3–12.

The authors’ 1980 paper describes hypothesising, circularity and neutrality as principles for family interviewing. The abstract describes a clinical approach, not proof of treatment effectiveness.

Source-mapped claims and evidence notes

Claim 1: The authors describe a model of family therapy using the concepts of paradox and counterparadox. (The catalogue identifies the work and its clinical subject. The full book was not reviewed for this entry.) [Source 1: Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1978). Paradox and counterparadox: A new model in the therapy of the family in schizophrenic transaction (E. V. Burt, Trans.). Jason Aronson.]

Claim 2: In their 1980 paper, the authors describe hypothesising, circularity and neutrality as principles for interviewing families. (The paper abstract was consulted; the full article was not reviewed.) [Source 3: Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing-circularity-neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19(1), 3–12.]

Sources and inspection notes

  1. Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1978). Paradox and counterparadox: A new model in the therapy of the family in schizophrenic transaction (E. V. Burt, Trans.). Jason Aronson.

    Book · Checked 4 November 2026

    Supports: US National Library of Medicine catalogue record for the 1978 English-language edition and translator; the full book was not reviewed.

  2. Bibliothèque Sigmund-Freud. Paradox and counterparadox: Catalogue record.

    Book · Checked 4 November 2026

    Supports: Catalogue listing the four authors and identifying the 1975 Italian original.

  3. Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing-circularity-neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19(1), 3–12.

    Peer-reviewed · Checked 4 November 2026

    Supports: Abstract describing the three principles for family interviewing; the full paper was not reviewed.

An educational reference. It does not diagnose, recommend treatment, match people with therapists or offer crisis support.